Skip to content

Advertisement

Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy

Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy Cover Image
Methodology
Open Access

Construction and importance of video based analyses teaching in physical education by use of window live movie maker

Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy20161:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40990-016-0003-2

©  The Author(s) 2016

Received: 24 July 2015

Accepted: 15 November 2015

Published: 2 August 2016

Abstract

Introduction

Today, Video Based Analysis (VBA) is one of the teaching methods widely used in different fields that help in effective teaching and learning process.

Objective

To construct a self made video based analysing teaching and to focus on the importance of VBA teaching method in the field of Physical Education (PE)

Method

For the purpose, a self- made video (Length = 00:02:21) was constructed. A series of set shoot skill by one athlete who represented university in basketball was recorded using high speed camera. The materials included are one digital video camera and a laptop or computer with the software Windows Live Movie Maker, which allows frame-by-frame playback of the video.

Outcomes

The outcomes of the study was that a self made video model was constructed by used of WLMM, which can be used as teaching tool, feedback tool, visual perception of the skill, creating interest to the participants. The skill was divided into three (3) phases for analysing the body and leverage movements while executing the skill which is unnoticeable by the naked eye in a fraction of seconds.

Conclusion

Using this video model (VBA) will offer varied opportunities as it allows performance to be paused, repeated, played in slow motion and can be used in all types of model-based practices like sports education. The use of VBA in teaching along with any model-based practices will help in improving the motor educability, efficiency and performance of the students.

Keywords

Video based analysisHigh speed cameraWindow live movie makerMotor educabilityFrame

Introduction

2006 2006Today’s world is a world of technology revolution, wherein the desire to capitalize the new generation’s appetite for multimedia presentations are increasing (Van Laarhoven & Myers 2006). In such a scenario adopting the audio- visual method of teaching would be the most apt as teaching in Physical Education (PE) is a huge challenge (McLean & Daniel 1996) as it involves learning by doing. The classroom in actuality is a field of activity that involves myriad forms of unique teaching methodology (Singh et al. 2005, p. 149). Video Based Analysis (VBA) is one of the many teaching aids that would offer teachers, lecturers and curriculum developers to inculcate interest (Towers 2007, Zelaznik, 1996) and attention (Ozkan, 2002) among their students. Videobased lectures can become a cost effective teaching method (Toledo University YouTube Fridays) in that they can be created once, and then saved in libraries to be used by a large number of academic educators (R.E.-.S.H. El-Sayed, S.E.-H.A.E.-R. El-Sayed 2013).

Video analysis is a common tool that is used in modern sports to increase coaching performance (Dam 2012; Martin 2011) for individual and team competitions (Harvey and Gittins, 2014). The National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE 2009) believes that technology can be an effective tool for supplementing instruction when used appropriately.Video instruction used in physical education is to provide students a view of their own performance or feedback as to what they have done (Silverman, 1997), or to provide instructors/coaches the proper steps to instruct others, not necessarily feedback on their own performance (Aaberg et al. 2001). Video-based coaching is an educational modality that targets intro-operative judgement, technique and teaching (Hu et al. 2012). Coaches and trainers use this method as a corrective method that will help in improving the performance of the athletes since they are only able to recall 30—50 % of key performance factors they had witnessed, even with special training in observation (Franks and Miller 1991; 9 (3), 285—297). It serves as a feedback for the players which in turn help in motivating them to perform better.

A. Lyons et al (2012), expressed greater perceived learning through the mediators of perceived usefulness of videos, class interactivity, and felt comfort in the class. The value of a video clip as a teaching tool lies in its potential to: 1. Tap simultaneously into core intelligences, 2. Engage both hemispheres of the brain, 3. Manipulate students’ alpha and beta brain waves i.e. relax or make them alert (Berk, 2009). Besides, the use of Video analysis software helps in gait analysis (Borel et al. 2011), biomechanics research (Curran and Frossard 2012) and injury rehabilitation (DeLisa et al. 1998; Eastlack et al. 1991) . Hence, the purpose of this paper is to emphasize the importance of Video Based Analyses teaching and inculcate the method in the field of Physical Education and Sports.

Definition

A page devoted to the specification of some defining operation is shown in Appendix: Table 2, as the area encompassed by the term may differ from the views of many readers.

Purpose

In this paper, it explains the purpose of, instructional manual for creation of, and usage instructions for video based analysis (VBA) by used of Window Live Movie Maker (WLMM), an emerging technique of video review attempting to encourage the use of video-based analysing teaching in PE. The secondary purpose of video based analysing teaching is to present a video methodology to deliver a more informed concept in a more interactive and engaging manner to understand the minute detailing of the physical movement of the athlete.

Material

The materials included one digital video camera with a tripod stand and a computer with software (window Live Movie Maker) allowing frame-by-frame playback of the video. Reflective marker is optional but it is very much needed to see the clear movements of the joints.

Participant

A National Basketball player who has represented University was recruited as subject for constructing a video-based analysis teaching video.

Procedure

The video capturing session was conducted at the basket-ball court of the Department of Physical Education, Aligarh Muslim University. A male former college basketball player volunteered to be the subject. He signed an informed consent document for the protection of the rights of research participant. Reflected markers (25 mm) were attached on the joints of the subject to see the clear movements of the skills. The stationary camera was kept on the tripod at an approximate horizontal distance of 7.5 m from the shooting area of the court and 1.5 m above ground level. The subject started the action from a stationary position about 4.5 m away from the basket. Figure 1 shows the REP- Model followed in bringing out this video.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Steps to construct VBA. Steps in constructing this video model are recording, editing and presentation (REP)

The first step is “Recording” of the skill. This was done with the Digital high speed camera (Cannon- Model EOS-7D) made in Japan. The video recorded was converted into AVI format using video converter (version 3.0.3) that allows synchronous audio-with-video playback.

The second step is “Editing” of the video recorded, by used of window live movie maker (WLMM). The video was played with WLMM by adding the video, start and end point was edited with the trim tools of the software (Fig. 2) to hide any unwanted part of the video clips. Speed of the video was controlled according to the need and the particular part to be analysed was paused. Snap shoot was taken during the skill execution (Fig. 3). The snap shoot picture (Ready Position, release of ball, etc) was saved in a new folder to construct a VBA teaching video. A new WLMM video editor was open, the saved snap shoot was added (Fig. 4) to construct the final video for highlighting the progressive changes of body movements during the skill execution starting from the ready position till the release of the ball. The music, title, etc was edited using “Edit Text Tool”. Lastly, an “Auto Movie Theme” (contemporary style, cinematic style, black and white style, etc) was chosen to play the presentation.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Setting start & end points with slow motion playback. The start and end point was edited with the trim tools of the software. The speed of video can be control by using video tools

Figure 3
Fig. 3

Taking snapshoot during playback. The snap shoot can be capture for analysing the phase during the playback session of the video

Figure 4
Fig. 4

Adding video or photos in WLMM. The video or snap shoot taken can be added to the video editor by using the add option

The last step is “Presentation” of video which can be used as a teaching tool, giving feedback, visual perception of the skill, etc. The flow-chart steps to prepare the video model are shown below:

Open WLMM < Add Video clips (Uncut) < Video tools < Set Start & End Point < Snap shoot < saving in a new folder < Open new WLMM < Adding the snap pictures < Add Title, music & caption < Editing the title < Chose Auto Movie Themes < Presentation.

Outcomes

The outcomes of the study was that a self made video model was constructed by used of WLMM, which can be used as teaching tools, feedback tool, visual perception of the skill, creating interest to the participants. The progressive change of the joints starting from the ready position till the release of the ball was analysed using the video model. These fast movements are not generally noticed by the naked eye. Therefore, it is important to use such video method, as initial learning stages involve understanding global aspects of the task (Ahissar and Hochstein, 2004). The learning of motor skill (Set Shoot) initially involve perception of an object, especially visual perception, the interest in perception accompany the development of the interest in skill acquisition (Singh et al. 2005, p.148). Mayer in 1996 also supported that learning a motor skill initially involves visual perception of the skill to be performed which inculcate interest in mental imaginary accompany the development of the interest in skill acquisition (Towers 2007).

Use of such video method in teaching may improve learning outcomes for students, even though it adds to cognitive load (Homer et al., 2008) and it create a sense of social presence (Gunawardena, 1995). Though players have different level of motor educability and different ranges of initial skill levels (Machar Reid 2009), which is the ability to learn motor skills easily and quickly (Mc. Cloy and Young 1984). Karkare (2015) found that group with higher motor educability have shown more physical skill compared to low motor educability group. Syamsuddin (2014) also studied the influence of teaching styles and motor educability on the learning outcomes of volleyball. He found that students who have a high motor educability, learning outcomes of volleyball through application of a practice style is better as compared to an inclusion style (Lecturer teaching).

Table 1 shows the basic movement of joints involved in the set shoot in basketball which will help the individual to visualize symbolic rehearsal of the skill. The technique to be learnt should be visualized in the mind without doing any muscular movements which will serve as a useful model for the athlete to analyse their progression for better future performance.
Table 1

Phases of set shoot in Basketball. Basic movement of joints involved in the set shoot

Phases

Body Position

Joints Movements

L- Phase

 ➢ Flexing of joints (Step 1)

 ➢ Angles of Joints decreases (Step 2)

 ➢ Range o f Motion (Step 3)

The throwing hand is in the shape of alphabet “L” when in ready position.

Counter-action of upper and lower extremities can be seen to balance the body.

Elbow Joint of the throwing hands makes an angle of 90 degree when ready position.

The elbows and knees joints start flexing which act as a lever to generate force for the action.

I-PHASE:

 ➢ Leverage Extension (Step 4)

 ➢ Back Spin (Step 5)

The throwing hand take I- shape when extended. The fingertips are used to release the ball to make it spin backward so that the ball remains near the rim.

The Elbow’s and Knees joints which act as a lever (1st class) start extending to give force to the ball.

GOODBYE PHASE:

 ➢ Follow Through

In the Good-bye phase, when you snap your wrist by waving like Good Bye.

The Elbows and knees joints axe fully extended so that the body weight is transfer to the feet. The wrist makes a follow through

By used of this one dimensional video-based analysis, the skill of set shoot in basketball was divided into three (3) phases for easy understanding of the skill execution:

  • ➢ L Phase,

  • ➢ I Phase and

  • ➢ Good Bye Phase

L-phase

As the outcomes of the videos, the progressive changes of body position, joints movements, etc can be depicted easily that will make to know the set shoot skill know more clearly. In the L-phase, throwing hand is in the shape of alphabet “L-shape” (Additional files 1, 2, 3 and 4).

Body position

When in ready position the heels rest lightly on the floor with weight on the balls of the feet. The feet are shoulder width apart. Ball held in front of the waist in the fingertips of two hands. Fingers spread wide with thumbs and little finger on 'Line'. Thumbs Close together at the rear. Elbows held close to the body. Head is stationary and erect (Martin Spencer). Eyes are fixed on the target (Additional file 1: Step 1).

Joints movements

From the ready position, the elbows and knees joints start flexing which act as a lever to generate force for the action (Additional file 2: Step 2). The elbows and knees angle decreases which act as a lever (Third Class Lever), counter action of upper and lower extremities can be seen to balance the body. The upper extremities are moving backward and lower extremities are moving forward to maintain stability (Additional file 3: Step 3). The ball is at overhead with one line of the body before the elbow and knees start extending to get a highest range of motion (Additional file 4: Step 4).

I-phase

The next phase of action is I-phase. In this phase the throwing hand take alphabet “I- shape” when extended for skill execution (Additional file 5: Step 5 and Additional file 6: Step 6).

Body position

The throwing hand take I- shape when extended. The fingertips are used to release the ball to make it spin backward so that the ball remains near the rim (Kentridge School 2003; Cull, 2003; Willis, 2001) which allow the ball to continue in a vertical path allowing the ball to have a greater chance of going in (Additional file 6: Step 6).

Joints movements

The Elbows and Knees which acts as a lever (1st class) start extending to give force to the ball. The ball act as a load, elbow joint; Fulcrum and Triceps muscle; Force as shown in Additional file 5: Step 5.

Goodbye-phase

In this phase, the wrist was snap like waving “Good bye” to control the ball. Good-bye phase release of ball as the arms reach full extension. Premature release of the ball will result in a jerky shot. In contrast, full extension of the arms prior to releasing the shot permits wrist action to impart back spin and “soften” the basketball shot (Tarkanian, 2015).

Body position

The Elbows and knees are fully extended so that the body weight is transfer to the feet. The ball in the hand(s) is kept until the arms are extended fully. The wrist makes a follow through and the ball is release with the fingertips (Additional file 7: Step 7).

Joints movements

The Elbows and knees joints are fully extended before the release of the ball to transfer the body weight is to the feet. The wrist makes a follow-through which provides direction to the flight of the ball.

The video model which was constructed with the help of WLMM to analyse the set shoot in basketball can be seen from the link given below.

Click the link below for Video Based Analysis Teaching Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTHeqhfg-WE

Discussion and importance of VBAT

Several researchers have investigated the efficacy of using video models within computer-based multimedia applications in different fields. It is used for teaching in mentally retarded students (Theresa Watkins et al. 1990), nurse students (R.E.-.S.H. El-Sayed, S.E.-H.A.E.-R. El-Sayed 2013, Krouse 2001), medical practitioners (Leopold, et al; 2005, Braslow et al., 1997), mathematics classroom practice (Savola, 2008), teachers` education (Beacher 2013) and for pedagogical sound instruction (Dubrowski and Xeroulis, 2005; University of Queensland, Australia IT@LI). Video can be used as teaching tools (Carrol et al. 1999), feedback for the students (Suby, 2009; Chow et al. 2008), problem solving and analytical skills among students (Jonassen and Hernandez-Serrano, 2002; Shepard and Cooper, 1982) and assist in mastery learning (Galbrainth, 2004).

Krouse in 2001 conducted a study video modelling/video instruction to nurses can also be beneficial and cost effective in delivering standardized information to more patients in a timely manner. He concluded that “the utility of video modelling instruction holds good promise for application to clinical practice in facilitating knowledge acquisition, reducing preparatory anxiety and improving self-care practices.” However, Theresa and co-workers (1990) studied on effects of video based training on spoken and signed language acquisition by students using both video plus therapist methods with mental retardation and found significantly higher sign production scores than the video only method.

Video instruction can also be utilized to enhance skills needed to develop proper techniques when administering a procedure, for example, Leopold, et al. (2005) discussed the confidence and competence of medical practitioners when executing an injection into the knee joint. The study concluded that even low-intensity forms of instruction could enhance a person’s confidence and competence when performing the skill.

Braslow et al. (1997) devised a video to teach CPR (Cardiopulmonary resuscitation) to students in their own home, which was used to train a group of lay people. After critiquing his videos and presenting the video instruction a second time to a different group, he concluded that both groups that had been presented videos as instructional tools performed CPR more competently and more effectively after training, than those that were only given the information from and instructor-led teaching method.

Another study by R.E.-.S.H. El-Sayed, S.E.-H.A.E.-R. El-Sayed (2013), video-based lectures offer more successes and reduce failures in the immediate and follow-up measures as compared with the traditional method (without video) of teaching human anatomy and physiology that was based on printout illustrations, but these differences were not statistically significant.

Harman (2012) in his workshop on Videos in Case-Based Teaching in the Sport Management Classroom suggested that Videos can be beneficial in the classroom for numerous reasons. Even in PE and Sports, the use of computer application has been drastically increasing in many develop countries as motor skill in PE cannot be learnt overnight. It is a progressive change that occurs as a result of observation, experience, or practice (Kamlesh and Sangral 1988, p. 3).

Blomqvist, et al, 2001, examined the effects of two forms of instruction, “traditional” and “traditional” plus strategy instruction (strategy-oriented), on students’ knowledge, game understanding, skill and game performance. The badminton players who received video-based strategy instruction for lessons were able to improve their badminton knowledge; game understanding and serving skill significantly whereas the group without video- based strategy instruction improved its badminton serving skill only. Dam (2012) video feedback may be a useful tool and should be aimed at utilizing that to improve instruction as well.

Importance of this video model

Many studies were conducted in different field of teaching showing the merits (Kearney and campbell 2010; Kearney and Schuck, 2006) and demerits (Karimi Mouneghi et al. 2003; Willis 2009) of using video in teaching and learning process, but fail to show the ways of constructing a video model. This video model will encourage the coaches/physical educators to create their own teaching video for the students.

Based on the discussion cited above, in this study on set shoot by used of WLMM, it has been noticed that there are many skills that are unnoticeable by the naked eye viz. progressive arms movements, release of ball with fingertips, counter action of upper and lower body, etc (Fig. 5). However, with the use of this VBA, each and every body and leverage movement of the joints could be analysed to note the minute details of the movement. Since learning and development of motor skill performance especially emphasizes on the cognitive set phenomena (Fitts, 1964), intelligence senson motoric (Piaget, 1950) and orderly sequencing thinking (Bartlett 1958). Likewise, the learning of motor skill (Set Shoot) involves the visual perception of the skill, knowledge of progressive changes of the body, technique of the skill, etc to be performed and this could be only possible after showing the technique repeatedly by use of video teaching.
Figure 5
Fig. 5

Progressive changes of body movements. The progressive changes in arm movements, counter action of upper and lower body, release of ball, etc. can be shown by the WLMM

Furthermore, self - observation is essential for athletes as their proprioception might be limited or even misleading (Frossard et al. 2006). When participants are engaged in motor learning, this encourages them to search for further structure in the task, so it is easier for the learner to catch on the perceptual learning system (Deroost and Soetens, 2006). The video model shows the progressive action of the skill which is easy for the learner to understand the skill. Mayr (1996) confirmed perceptual and motor learning when sequences were learned concurrently. Chin-Yun Huang (2000), found that low-ability (motor educability) students had more positive attitudes than high-ability students and this could be possible by use of such video model in teaching.

Other supporter for video based learning is provided by the studies of Lyons, Reysen, and Pierce (2012) and Suby (2009) and Harvey and Gittins (2014). All of them suggested use of video in online learning, videotape feedback in PE and integrating video-based feedback into teaching games into learning. They demonstrated that used of video learning enhance learning, create interest and efficacy of using video-based technology to improve game performance.

Video-based educational method alone is not effective as demonstration method but it can be a suitable substitution when we are not able to perform the demonstrating method or when it is not cost-effective (Karimi Mouneghi et al. 2003). However, cheng and colleague have found out that video-based education can be as effective as lecture-based instruction (Chen et al. 1998) and even sometimes better than that in different presentation method. This video model can highlight all those skills or body position which can be watch repeatedly by the learners`.

Conclusion

Using this video model (VBA) will offer varied opportunities as it allows performance to be paused, repeated, played in slow motion and can be used in all types of model-based practices like sports education. Players learn in different ways, at different rates and have different entry behaviours (Machar Reid 2009). Due to individual cognitive difference, some are quick learner while others are slow. Findings and statistics have shown that the best means of facilitating or enhancing good teaching and learning is through the use of both demonstration and instructional materials which encompass audio visual materials like video based analyses. Therefore, it is recommended to use both demonstration and video method in teaching the athletes in PE.

Limitation

Certain parameters like Velocity, Acceleration, Time of action, Angles, Distance/Displacement, Momentum, Speed, etc cannot be analysed using this video method.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Prof. Ikram Hussain for giving me a flat-form about video- graphic technique in movement analysis. Thanks to Dr. Suhel Raza (Sr. Biomechanical Analyst) for the guidance in capturing the video. I acknowledge Ms. Deepa Khomdram for proof reading.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Manipur University, Manipur, India

References

  1. Aaberg E, Fink D, Johns R (2001) Resistance training instruction: upper body (video). Human Kinetics. http://www.westpoint.edu/cfe/literature/vandam_12.pdf
  2. Ahissar M, Hochstein S (2004) The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends Cogn Sci 8(10):457–64. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.011 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartlett FC (1958) Thinking: An experimental and social study. George Allen & Unwin, London. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=Oeg98H3E9yIC&pg=PA184&lpg=PA184&dq=Bartlett+FC+(1985)+Thinking.+London+Allen+and+Unwin&source=bl&ots=4QldTuyen5&sig=Dh9jexyY24Wcz3RtUchXPuimH50&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwip5NyWl8jNAhWMN48KHVu0A34Q6AEIJTAB#v=onepage&q=Bartlett%20FC%20(1985)%20Thinking.%20London%20Allen%20and%20Unwin&f=false
  4. Beacher L (2013) Implementing video analysis into teacher education: some why`s and How`s. NYSED/SCALE webinar. http://www.hunter.cuny.edu/school-of-education/technology/vat/overviewGoogle Scholar
  5. Berk RA (2009) Multimedia teaching with video clips: TV, movies You Tube, and mtvU in the college classroom. Int J Technol Teach Learn 5(1):1–21. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=3FBDEA41219010EF2A5254941180445E?doi=10.1.1.580.7069&rep=rep1&type=pdf Google Scholar
  6. Blomqvist M, Luhtanen P, Laaks L (2001) Comparison of Two Types of Instruction in Badminton. European J Physical Educ 6(2):139–155. doi:10.1080/1740898010060206. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1740898010060206
  7. Borel S, Schneider P, Newman CJ, et al. (2011) Video analysis software increases interrater reliability if video gait assessment in children with cerebral palsy, Gait & Posture 33(4):727–729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.012
  8. Braslow A, Brennan RT, Newman MM, Bircher NG, Batcheller AM, Kaye W (1997) CPR training without an instructor: development and evaluation of a video self-instructional system for effective performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 34(3):207–220. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9178381 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrol Herrol, Steven P. Cole, Cathleen Corrie, Sebastian Dubreil (1999) The effectiveness of a Video-Based curriculum in Teaching Culture. Mod Lang J 83(iv):518–533. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0026-7902.00038/abstract
  10. Chen MS, Horrocks EN, Evans RD (1998). Video versus lecture: effective alternatives for orthodontic auxiliary training. Br J Orthod; 25(3):191-5. PMID:9800017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9800017
  11. Chin-Yun Huang (2000) The Effects of Cooperative Learning and ModelDemonstration Strategies on Motor Skill Performance during Video Instruction. Proc Natl Sci Counc 2000: ROC(C)Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 255-268. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.134.8854&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  12. Chow Bik, Cheung Siu-yin, Ng Judy (2008) Enhancement of Sport Skill Learning through Intensive Peer and Teacher Feedback. Learning by Doing, p 49-57. http://cei.ust.hk/files/public/1e49-58.pdf
  13. Cull Tom. Re (2003) Why is putting rotation on a basketball when you shoot good. Picker International. 6 June 1999. http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/jun99/929552614.Ph.r.html
  14. Curran S, Frossard L (2012) Biomechanical analyses of the performance of Paralympians: From foundation to elite level. Prosthetics Orthot Int 36(3):380-395. http://poi.sagepub.com/content/36/3/380
  15. DeLisa JA (ed) (1998) Gait Analysis in the Science of Rehabilitation, Department of Veterans Affairs Scientific and Technical Publications, Baltimore. https://ia800206.us.archive.org/6/items/gaitanalysisinsc00joel/gaitanalysisinsc00joel.pdf
  16. Deroost N, Soetens E (2006) Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures. Psychol Res 70:88–102View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Dubrowski A, Xeroulis G (2005) Computer-based video instructions for acquisition of technical skills. J Vis Commun Med 28(4):150–155. doi:10.1080/01405110500518622. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01405110500518622?journalCode=ijau20
  18. Eastlack ME et al (1991) Interrater reliability of videotaped observational gait analysis assessments. Phys Ther 71(6):465–472Google Scholar
  19. Fitts PM (1964) Perceptual-motor skill learning. In: Melton AW (ed) Categories of human learning. Academic Press, New York. http://e.guigon.free.fr/rsc/incoll/Fitts64.pdf
  20. Franks I, Miller G (1991) Training Coaches to Observe and Remember. J Sports Sci 9:285–297, No 3, Autumn. doi:10.1080/02640419108729890. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02640419108729890?journalCode=rjsp20 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Frossard L, O’Riordan A, Goodman S (2006). Applied biomechanics for evidence-based training of Australian elite seated throwers. "Sport for Persons with a Disability” Perspectives: The Multidisciplinary Series of Physical Education and Sport Science. International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education. 7. p 175-198. http://www.laurentfrossard.com/researcher-publications/book-chapters
  22. Galbrainth J (2004) Active viewing: and oxymoron in video-based instruction? Society for Applied Learning Technologies Conference, http://designer.50g.com/docs/Salt_2004.pdf Google Scholar
  23. Gunawardena C (1995) Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. Int J Educ Telecommunications 1:147–166. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/15156 Google Scholar
  24. Harman, Alanna Videos in Case-Based Teaching in the Sport Management Classroom, Teaching Innovation Projects 2012; Vol. 2:Iss. 2, Article 5. Available at: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/tips/vol2/iss2/5/
  25. Harvey S, & Gittins C (2014) Effect of integrating video-based feedback into a teaching games for understanding soccer unit. Agro Para la Education Fisicay el De-Porte, Agora for PE and Sports, vol. 16, p 271–290. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4908470 Google Scholar
  26. Homer DB, Plass LJ, Blake L (2008) The effect of video on cognitive load and social presence in multimedia-learning. Computer in Human Behavior 24:786–797. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563207000544 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Howard N Zelaznik 1996 Advances in motor learning and control, https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=7m3F7460foEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Howard+N+Zelaznik+1996+Advances+in+motor+learning+and+control,&ots=gZOyqSxxdR&sig=UyjrKZHblFvM9rulaldtzvbvwgc#v=onepage&q=Howard%20N%20Zelaznik%201996%20Advances%20in%20motor%20learning%20and%20control%2C&f=false
  28. Hu YY, Peyre SE, Arriaga AF, Osteen RT, Corso KA, Weiser TG, Swanson RS, Ashley SW, Raut CP, Zinner MJ, Gawande AA, Greenberg CC (2012) Postgame Analysis: Using Video-Based Coaching for Continuous Professional Development. JAM Coll Surg; 214(1): 115-24. doi10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.009.
  29. Jerry Tarkanian (2015). (In). Basketball Shooting - The Art & Science of Shooting a Basketball. Access on Wednesday September 2. 2015, http://www.coachlikeapro.com/basketball-shooting.html.
  30. Jonassen DH & Hernandez-Serrano J (2002) Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving. Educ Technol Res Dev 50(2):65–77. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02504994
  31. Kamlesh ML, Sangral MS (1988). In. “Method in Physical Education.” Tandoon Publication, Ludhiana, pp- 3Google Scholar
  32. Karimi Mouneghi H, Derakhshan A, Valai N, Mortazavi F (2003) The effectiveness of video-based education on gaining practical learning skills in comparison with demonstrating method’s effectiveness among university students. J Medical Educ Fall 4(1):27–30. http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/jme/article/viewFile/855/749 Google Scholar
  33. Karkare AY (2015) Effect of motor educability and tribal and non tribal belongingness on physical skills of male players. Res J Recent Sci 4:162–164. http://www.isca.in/rjrs/archive/v4/iISC-2014/26.ISCA-ISC-2014-Oral-15PESS-27.pdf Google Scholar
  34. Kearney M, & Campbell C, (2010) Digital Storytelling Generic Learning Design. Retrieved September 9, 2015, from LAMS Foundation site: http://implementinglearningdesigns.lamsfoundation.org/page6/page17/page17.html
  35. Kearney M, Schuck S (2006) Spotlight on authentic learning: Student developed digital video projects. Australasian J Educ Technol 22(2):189–208. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292713239_Spotlight_on_authentic_learning_Student_developed_digital_video_projects Google Scholar
  36. Kentridge School District (2003) The Physics of Basketball. http://www2.hesston.edu/Physics/Basketball/Paperpg.htm
  37. Krouse J (2001) Video modeling to educate patients. J Adv Nurs 33(6):748–757. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11298212##View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Leopold SS, Morgan HD, Kadel NJ, Gardner GC, Schaad DC, Wolf FM (2005) Impact of educational intervention on confidence and competence in the performance of a simple surgical task. J Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc 87-A(5):1031–1037. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15866966
  39. Lyons A, Reysen S, Pierce L (2012) Video lecture format, student technological efficacy, and social presence in online courses. Computers in Human Behavior 28:181–186. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563211001920 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Martin Lee (2011) The use of video feedback as a performance analysis coaching tool in amateur level ice hockey. Bachelor’s Thesis, Haaga Helia University of Applied Sciences. https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/31444
  41. Martin Spencer. http://www.mini-basketball.org.uk/skills/.
  42. Mayr U (1996) Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning:Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22:350–364. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8901340 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Mc. Cloy CH, Young ND (1984) Test and Measurement in Health and Physical education. Appleton Century Crofts Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. McLean, Daniel D (1996) Use of Computer-based Technology in Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance. ERIC Digest.Source: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education Washington DC. ERIC Identifier: ED390874. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED390874
  45. Miguel Crespo and Machar Reid (2009) Individual Differences In Advanced Coaching. International Tennis Federation, Coach Education Series Copyright © ITFGoogle Scholar
  46. National Association for Sport and Physical Education (2009) Appropriate use of instructional technology in physical education [Position statement]. Reston, VA: Author. http://getfitarkansas.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/62316594/Appropriate-Use-of-Instructional-Technology-in-PE-2009-2.pdf
  47. Ozkan B (2002) The Use of Video Cases in Teacher Education TOJET Oct. 2002; ISSN 1303-6521, vol. 1 issue, 1; pp. 37–40. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v1i1/116.pdf
  48. Piaget J (1950) Psychologie de lintelligence. New york Harcourt, BraceGoogle Scholar
  49. Rabab El-Sayed Hassan E-S, Samar El-Hoseiny Abd El-Raouf E-S (2013) Video-based lectures: An emerging paradigm for teaching human anatomy and physiology to student nurses. Alexandria J Med 49:215–222. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090506812001091 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Savola LT (2008) Video-based analysis of mathematics classroom practice: example from Finland and Iceland, doctoral diss. Columbia University, The Graduate school of Arts and Sciences. http://www.ru.is/publications/SoHE/LasseSavola2008.pdf Google Scholar
  51. Shepard R, Cooper L (1982) Mental images and their transformations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  52. Silverman S (1997) Technology and physical education: present, possibilities, and potential problems. American Academy of Kinesiology Physical Education 49:306–314. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00336297.1997.10484246 Google Scholar
  53. Singh A, Bains J, Gill JS, Brar RS, Nirmaljiy R (2005) Learning, motor skill learning and learning curve. In: Essential of Physical Education. Kalyani Publication, New Delhi, pp 148–149. ISBN 81-272-1167-2Google Scholar
  54. Suby J (2009) The use of videotape feedback in physical education. United States Military Academy, West PointGoogle Scholar
  55. Syamsuddin (2014) Influences of teaching styles and motor educability on learning outcomes of volleyball. Asian Soc Sci 10(5):109–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n5p109
  56. Theresa Watkins L, Sprafkin JN, Krolikowski DM (1990) Effects of video based training on spoken and signed language acquisition by students with mental retardation. Res Dev Disabil 11(3):273–288. PMID:1697973. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1697973 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. The University of Queensland, IT@LI. Pedagogical benefits. http://www.uq.edu.au/teach/video-teach-learn/ped-benefits.html
  58. Towers J (2007) Using video in teacher education. Canadian J Learning Technol 33(2):Spring / printemps. http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/7/7 Google Scholar
  59. Van Dam D (2012) The use of video based instruction in physical education class – mountain biking. United States Military Academy, West Point. http://www.westpoint.edu/cfe/literature/vandam_12.pdf Google Scholar
  60. Van Laarhoven T, Myers TVL (2006) Comparison of Three Video-based Instructional Procedures for Teaching Daily Living Skills to Persons with Developmental Disabilities. Educational Training in Developmental Disabilities 41(4):365–381. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879663?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Google Scholar
  61. Willis B (2001) The Physics of Basketball. https://blogs.umass.edu/p139and/2012/12/13/physics-of-basketball
  62. Willis H (2009) Video: The Good the Bad and the Ugly. EDUCAUSE Review 44(6):106–107. http://er.educause.edu/~/media/files/article-downloads/erm09612.pdf
  63. You Tube Fridays: A collection of videos used in classes. http://www.eng.utoledo.edu/~mliberat/youtube.html

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement